Advancing our understanding of distraction by unexpected sounds: Mechanisms, Contextual Modulation, and Individual Differences (ADVANCE)

Full list of references featured in the proposal, in APA format.

Ammons, R. B. (1947). Acquisition of motor skill: II. Rotary pursuit performance with continuous practice before and after a single rest. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(5), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054334

Barkley, R. A. (2011). Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale-IV (BAARS-IV). The Guilford Press.

Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Deouell, L. Y., Wetzel, N., Maedebach, A., & Schröger, E. (2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 2130–2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.004

Berti, S. (2008). Cognitive control after distraction: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00660.x

Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00044-6

Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17(5), 1119–1122. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02527.x

Castellanos, F. X., & Proal, E. (2012). Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: Beyond the prefrontal-striatal model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.007

Coghill, D., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2012). Annual Research Review: Categories versus dimensions in the classification and conceptualisation of child and adolescent mental disorders – implications of recent empirical study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(5), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02511.x

Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2013). Context-dependent control over attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 836–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030027

Coull, J. T., Nobre, A. C., & Frith, C. D. (2001). The noradrenergic α2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting. Cerebral Cortex, 11(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.1.73

Coy, N., Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2022). Is the oddball just an odd-one-out? The predictive value of rule-violating events. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 5(3–4), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2022.2094657

Diesburg, D. A., & Wessel, J. R. (2021). The Pause-then-Cancel model of human action-stopping: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 129, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.019

Dutra, I. C., Waller, D. A., & Wessel, J. R. (2018). Perceptual surprise improves action stopping by non-selectively suppressing motor activity via a neural mechanism for motor inhibition. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(6), 3091–17. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3091-17.2017

Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562997

Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2016). Establishing the Attention-Distractibility Trait. Psychological Science, 27(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615617761

Friston, K., & Kiebel, S. (2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1211. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2008.0300

Gallego-Munar, L., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2025). The relationship between mind-wandering and attentional measures in a modified AX-CPT [Manuscript in preparation].

Gallego-Munar, L., Servera, M., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2025). Exploring the relationship between attentional functions in a modified AX-CPT and ADHD symptomatology in a non-clinical sample of young adults [Manuscrupt in preparation].

García-López, E., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2024). Distraction by unexpected sounds: Comparing response repetition and response switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1451008. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2024.1451008/BIBTEX

García-López, E., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2025). Do deviant stimuli hinder response repetition, facilitate response change, or both? [Manuscript submitted for publication.].

Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Content-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x

Graupner, S. T., Velichkovsky, B. M., Pannasch, S., & Marx, J. (2007). Surprise, surprise: Two distinct components in the visually evoked distractor effect. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00504.x

Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009). Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 137–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGPSYCH.2008.06.001

Gumenyuk, V., Korzyukov, O., Escera, C., Hamalainen, M., Huotilainen, M., Hayrinen, T., Oksanen, H., Naatanen, R., von Wendt, L., & Alho, K. (2005). Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced distractibility in ADHD children. Neuroscience Letters, 374(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.081

Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(4), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736

Isarida, T., & Isarida, T. K. (2010). Effects of simple and complex-place contexts in the multiple-context paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(12), 2399–2412. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003736756

Körner, U., Röer, J. P., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2017). Working memory capacity is equally unrelated to auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 96(October), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.05.005

Leiva, A., Andrés, P., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2015). When aging does not increase distraction: Evidence from pure auditory and visual oddball tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1612–1622. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000112

Leiva, A., Andrés, P., Servera, M., Verbruggen, F., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2016). The role of age, working Memory, and response inhibition in deviance distraction: A cross-sectional study. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1381–1393. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000163

Leiva, A., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Andrés, P. (2015a). Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 79(3), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0573-5

Leiva, A., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Andrés, P. (2015b). Distraction by deviance Comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing. Experimental Psychology, 62(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000273

Li, B., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Zhang, M. (2013). Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound’s informational value: Evidence from an auditory discrimination task. Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000196

Light, L. L., & Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80002-0

Macken, W. J. (2002). Environmental context and recognition: The role of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.153

Mahajan, Y., Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2020). Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults? BMC Geriatrics, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01909-w

Marcus, D. K., & Barry, T. D. (2011). Does Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Have a Dimensional Latent Structure? A Taxometric Analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(2), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021405

Max, C., Widmann, A., Kotz, S. A., Schröger, E., & Wetzel, N. (2015). Distraction by emotional sounds: Disentangling arousal benefits and orienting costs. Emotion, 15(4), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039041

Maybery, M. T., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(3), 360–385.

Moskowitz, H. S., & Sussman, E. S. (2023). Sound category habituation requires task-relevant attention. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17(1228506). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1228506

Neely, J. H., & Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic Context Effects on Visual Word Processing: A Hybrid Prospective-Retrospective Processing Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 24(C), 207–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60538-1

Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111(2), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.002

Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42(3), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139631724

Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Gelabert, J. M., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2016). Can auditory deviant stimuli temporarily suspend cognitive processing? Evidence from patients with anxiety. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(1), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1031145

Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2014). Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli. Emotion, 14(1), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034289

Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2016). Happiness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12148

Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109(3), 345–362.

Parmentier, F. B. R. (2014). The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: A review. Psychological Research, 78(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4

Parmentier, F. B. R. (2016). Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds’ informational value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000195

Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & Miguel, I. S. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106(1), 408–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.008

Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.001

Parmentier, F. B. R., English, M., & Maybery, M. T. (2024). Auditory context-dependent distraction by unexpected visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13423-024-02527-Y

Parmentier, F. B. R., & Gallego, L. (2020). Is deviance distraction immune to the prior sequential learning of stimuli and responses ? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01717-8

Parmentier, F. B. R., Gallego, L., Micucci, A., Leiva, A., Andrés, P., & Maybery, M. T. (2022). Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context. Scientific Reports 2022 12:1, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25500-y

Parmentier, F. B. R., & Hebrero, M. (2013). Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1635–1641. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032421

Parmentier, F. B. R., Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., & Valero, S. (2018). Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words. PLOS ONE, 13(1), e0190644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190644

Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Perez, L. (2014). A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031550

Parmentier, F. B. R., Vasilev, M. R., & Andrés, P. (2018). Surprise as an explanation to auditory novelty distraction and post-error slowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000497

Pelletier, M. F., Hodgetts, H. M., Lafleur, M. F., Vincent, A., & Tremblay, S. (2016). Vulnerability to the Irrelevant Sound Effect in Adult ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(4), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713492563

Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. Response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.001

Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Körner, U., & Buchner, A. (2018). Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 172, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.005

Sabu, S., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Horváth, J. (2024). Involuntary motor responses are elicited both by rare sounds and rare pitch changes. Scientific Reports 2024 14:1, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70776-x

SanMiguel, I., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010). Attention capture by novel sounds: Distraction versus facilitation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(4), 481–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440902930994

SanMiguel, I., Morgan, H. M., Klein, C., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010). On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: Facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biological Psychology, 83(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.11.012

Schomaker, J., & Meeter, M. (2014). Facilitation of responses by task-irrelevant complex deviant stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 148, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.006

Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.527

Schröger, E., Kotz, S. A., & SanMiguel, I. (2015). Bridging prediction and attention in current research on perception and action. Brain Research, 1626, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.037

Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157

Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Higher Nervous Functions: The Orienting Reflex. Annual Review of Physiology, 25(1), 545–580. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553

Sussman, E. S. (2007). A new view on the MMN and attention debate: The role of context in processing auditory events. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21(3–4), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.21.34.164

Sussman, E. S. (2017). Auditory Scene Analysis: An Attention Perspective. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 60(10), 2989–3000. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0041

Sussman, E. S., Chen, S., Sussman-Fort, J., & Dinces, E. (2014). The five myths of MMN: Redefining how to Use MMN in basic and clinical research. Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 553 - 564, 27(4), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0326-6

Sussman, E. S., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2003). Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 630–637. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196525

Szmalec, A., Duyck, W., Vandierendonck, A., Mata, A. B., & Page, M. P. A. (2009). The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of novel word learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(3), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802386375

Thiel, C. M., & Fink, G. R. (2007). Visual and auditory alertness: Modality-specific and supramodal neural mechanisms and their modulation by nicotine. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97(4), 2758–2768. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00017.2007

van Mourik, R., Oosterlaan, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., Konig, C. E., & Sergeant, J. A. (2007). When distraction is not distracting: A behavioral and ERP study on distraction in ADHD. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(8), 1855–1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.05.007

Vasilev, M. R., Kirkby, J. A., & Angele, B. (2018). Auditory distraction during reading: A Bayesian meta-analysis of a continuing controversy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(5), 567–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617747398

Vasilev, M. R., Lowman, M., Bills, K., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Kirkby, J. A. (2023). Unexpected sounds inhibit the movement of the eyes during reading and letter scanning. Psychophysiology, e14389. https://doi.org/10.1111/PSYP.14389

Vasilev, M. R., Ozkan, Z. G., Kirkby, J. A., Nuthmann, A., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2025). Unexpected sounds induce a rapid inhibition of eye-movement responses. Psychophysiology, 62(1), e14728. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14728

Vasilev, M. R., Parmentier, F. B. R., Angele, B., & Kirkby, J. A. (2019). Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(7), 1863–1875. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818820816

Vasilev, M. R., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Kirkby, J. A. (2020). Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

Vasilev, M. R., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Kirkby, J. A. (2021). Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(5), 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820982267

Volosin, M., & Horváth, J. (2020). Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm. Brain Research, 1727, 146565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146565

Weise, A., Hartmann, T., Parmentier, | Fabrice, Weisz, N., & Ruhnau, P. (2023). Involuntary shifts of spatial attention contribute to distraction—Evidence from oscillatory alpha power and reaction time data. Psychophysiology, 00, e14353. https://doi.org/10.1111/PSYP.14353

Wessel, J. R. (2018a). A Neural Mechanism for Surprise-related Interruptions of Visuospatial Working Memory. Cerebral Cortex, 28(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw367

Wessel, J. R. (2018b). An adaptive orienting theory of error processing. Psychophysiology, 55(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13041

Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2013). Unexpected events induce motor slowing via a brain mechanism for action-stopping with global suppressive effects. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(47), 18481–18491. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3456-13.2013

Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2017). On the globality of motor suppression: Unexpected events and their influence on behavior and cognition. Neuron, 93(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013

Widmann, A., Engbert, R., & Schröger, E. (2014). Microsaccadic responses indicate fast categorization of sounds: A novel approach to study auditory cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(33), 11152–11158. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1568-14.2014